Sooo... I kind of wanted to start writing for Inception, so I figured, start short, so I meandered to inception100 to find prompts and write drabbles.

Here's prompt 001:

Cause I just got distracted by a certain fanfic for quite a while... Do lots of fandoms have AU's where the couple in question do not know each other and are either both or just one (a) BNF and then the meet online and there is going to the same con and the same panel (that invaribly involves Doctor Who) and them writing some magnificantly long fic together and getting together and shagging off screen at some point or another and a give away of their identity and also sharing the name of the characters of the pairing they ship? (why yes, that's a run on sentence)

Because, um, I need it in my life. I mean, really, really. When I read 'Pairing: Pendragon/Merlin' I couldn't stop grinning. And then, tonight, I finally read 'The Theory of Narrative Casuality'. I kind of avoided 'The Theory of Narrative Casuality' because I couldn't see it, but then everyone was reccing it (and of course, 'Pairing: Pendragon/Merlin' would pop into my mind every time I read the Sherlock version of the prompt, so there) and I really like it. Really, really liked it. I mena, the fics are totally different dispite all the similarities. They are so different.

But now, this is making me want, I don't know, an Inception (or something) version of this, though I don't know how that would work since it works in the Merlin and Sherlock fandom because those are both reimaginings of something that existed long before this particular incarnation. Though this does remind me of my friend who read a romance novel where the two main characters shared names with her and her boyfriend.

Haha. Just wanted to plop this down into my journal for no reason... Since I never really used this as a journal before, so I guess I'll just pop my random thoughts into here sometime or write about something in fandom that made me happy (like this post). Or complain about school, just because.

Probably because I can't stop changing my mind about what I'm going to be presenting. I'm going to complain because I got Lord of the Flies, which we already analysed to death with symbolism, Maslow Heirarchy, Keirsey/Jung/Myers-Briggs personality types, Freudian structure of the mind, themes (but not going to whine too much because I could have gotten books that were worse... EXCEPT THERE ARE NO FEMALE CHARACTERS in LotF...)

First: Analysis of the characters using Jung's Archetypes

Second: Analysis of characters using traditional archetypes commonly found in fiction

Third: Journal entries as Ralph, Jack, and Roger ten years in the future reflecting on their day/life in general using the Keirsey personality types to realistically extrapolate on their personalities in the book into adults that have had ten years to mature. (Weird 'cause I'm a girl... and hard... Because I'm a girl. And I'm having trouble getting into their voices)

Fourth: Analysis of what went wrong with their societies and offer counter decisions/solutions that would have given them a better chance of survival based on which each character needs to reach fufillment based on their Keirsey personality and the Maslow Heirarchy.

Fifth: Analyse the importance and affect of herd mentality and group think on the outcome of the novel and how that affects the common high school interpretation of 'humans are inherently evil'.

I'm still flip flopping between the third, fourth, and fifth choices, though I'm pretty sure I'm going to with the fifth choice. I MEAN, THE PRESENTATION IS IN JUST OVER 24 HOURS AND THE SPEECH ISN'T WRITTEN YET. Sorry for just kvetching, but I'm just frustrated with myself.